Delegates attending the national convention of the Conservative Party in Calgary overwhelmingly approved a law resembling “stand your ground” legislation, allowing individuals to use lethal force to defend themselves against intruders in their residences. This policy was just one of many discussed and ratified by delegates at the biannual event, with a focus on crime, immigration, and social issues.
Following a solid show of support for Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, party members updated their policy platform in preparation for a potential upcoming federal election. Delegates expressed the desire for Poilievre to eliminate further drug decriminalization, enhance bail regulations, and introduce stricter laws to combat intimate partner violence.
Over 90% of delegates called for the elimination of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in favor of restoring “meritocracy.” Additionally, a significant majority, with some opposition from Quebec, voted for the defunding of CBC/Radio-Canada.
Immigration was a key theme at the convention, with approximately 77% of delegates endorsing a policy for the immediate deportation of non-citizens convicted of serious offenses, along with a default permanent ban on re-entry and asset forfeiture for foreign criminals. Delegates also supported tighter immigration controls, emphasizing the need for enhanced screening of potential newcomers, border security reform, and asylum system reforms.
While most policies gained broad approval, there was a notable division within the party regarding the opposition to the existing ban on “conversion therapy.” The contentious policy criminalizes attempts to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity. Despite some delegates supporting the opposition to the ban, it did not secure the required majority across provinces and territories.
A highlight of the convention was the endorsement of a self-defence policy allowing Canadians to protect their homes with decisive force without fear of criminal prosecution. The proposal, backed by 91% of members, aimed to address incidents where individuals defending themselves faced legal consequences.
Furthermore, grassroots Conservatives advocated for increased local influence in candidate selection, with delegates supporting measures for local officials to vet and recommend nominees. The constitutional changes aimed to prevent undue central control in candidate nominations and ensure fair selection processes across electoral districts.
These revisions followed concerns of national party interference in local candidate selections, with instances of contested nominations in various ridings. The amendments sought to address grievances of favoritism and lack of transparency in candidate appointments within the Conservative Party.